
This turned out to be a challenging and good thing, because we had to think more creatively to fulfill our goal of making our robotic bug. After surveying materials, we decided to use dumb motors, gears and clear plastic to make the frame. My job was to design the aesthetics or "shell" of the bug. This proved to be a very daunting task, because how was I to create the exterior cover of the bug when the interior was not really conceptualized? I had a rough set of measurements, but I am not mathematically inclined enough to actually figure out how large to make semi-circle "scales" over a rectangular frame. So I spent the first part of the day conceptualizing the design.


We have learned much about the Society in the last two weeks and what I am most unclear about is how all of the sub-spaces of the Society fit together. This certainly needs more investigation on my part, especially since the connection seems crucial so understanding how De Waag wishes to solve social issues.
Part 2: Meeting with Tom and Peter (Dylan's Technology Interview)
We the Media group had our first interview of three today, with Peter Fekkes, Manager of the Media Lab, and Tom Demeyer, Head of Technology.
The interview was very informative. I think Clint's idea for all of us to attend all of our scheduled interviews, regardless of topic, was the best idea since all of our individual research questions are so related.
The most important bit of information I learned about the society was that De Waag does not actually develop new technologies. Rather they implement existing technology in new and creative ways to solve some social problem. Generally this means creating a prototype with a certain group in mind, such as old folks or mentally challenged individuals. Technology is usually secondary to their projects, and if using a low-level technology is the best and most efficient means of solving a problem, then the low-level technology will be used.
Another comment I found fascinating was the comment that "no nerds work here." I suspect this is not totally true, since technology and new media IS an integral part of the work De Waag does and therefore there probably are individuals who are very interested in technology. But from who we have met at De Waag, there seems to be a striking parallel between those who work at De Waag and those who work at VKS: all individuals with diverse multiple backgrounds in seemingly unrelated fields. Is this unique to these two institutions, or is this type of background highly valued in Amsterdam? Or Europe?
The interview was very informative. I think Clint's idea for all of us to attend all of our scheduled interviews, regardless of topic, was the best idea since all of our individual research questions are so related.
The most important bit of information I learned about the society was that De Waag does not actually develop new technologies. Rather they implement existing technology in new and creative ways to solve some social problem. Generally this means creating a prototype with a certain group in mind, such as old folks or mentally challenged individuals. Technology is usually secondary to their projects, and if using a low-level technology is the best and most efficient means of solving a problem, then the low-level technology will be used.
Another comment I found fascinating was the comment that "no nerds work here." I suspect this is not totally true, since technology and new media IS an integral part of the work De Waag does and therefore there probably are individuals who are very interested in technology. But from who we have met at De Waag, there seems to be a striking parallel between those who work at De Waag and those who work at VKS: all individuals with diverse multiple backgrounds in seemingly unrelated fields. Is this unique to these two institutions, or is this type of background highly valued in Amsterdam? Or Europe?
Part 3: Tour of Westergasfabriek
Our travel from Prinsengracht to Westergasfabriek:
View Larger Map
My video pails in comparison to some others that have been posted. I hoped to pick up some audio of Pol talking about the park, but the wind distorted it too much to be of any use. You can hear him talking about the huge number of people who visit the park. So here is a 360 view of the center of the park. Note the kids playing soccer and open green and concrete space.


This "Park of the 21st Century" is divided into four parts:
-Living Park
-Living Lab
-Services
-Events
He made notes to show us the structure. I apologize for the poor photo quality.

Pol is working with De Waag to conceptualize some prototypes for creating this living park.
No comments:
Post a Comment