Sunday, August 10, 2008

8/9/2008: Mieke Bal and the Private Screening

Disclaimer: The following entry does not reflect the opinions of the program.

As a business administration and international studies major researching the international political economy and working for a humanitarian/development organization, I am often dubious of work the humanities. For me, poetry analysis, while certainly interesting and undeniably an exercise in critical thinking, is not particularly relevant unless the “knowledge” gained by interpreting a line in that poem can be applied to a social, political, or economic situation. And if this “knowledge” is kept within a select group of academics, its production is all the more pointless.

My tremendous respect for Mieke Bal stems from her ability to incorporate contemporary issues and an efficient, wide-reaching medium into her work in the humanities. She produces “untraditional documentaries” without narration; each film is a collection of scenes intended to “activate” the mind of the reader. The audio/visual medium serves two purposes: while academics papers are not often written with the subject but about the subject, the subjects of a documentary obviously are involved in the making and often participate in the editing of a video, meaning viewers have a much closer connection with the study. Secondly, a film reaches a different and broader audience than an academic paper (even if the video is shown in an art gallery rather than French national television). The knowledge produced is no longer confined to a close-knit academic circle and therefore necessarily involves and "activates" the outside world.

We were fortunate to watch three of Mieke’s videos—Access Denied, Lost in Space, and Mille et un Jours—in a private screening this afternoon. For those who missed the screening, synopses can be found here. Access Denied focused on cross-cultural understanding (or in some cases, a conspicuous lack of it) and the concept of collective memory, especially in the context of pre-1948 and al nakba. In terms of collective memory, I found Ihab's interview scenes with the older generation to be the most potent: their memory of British-cantoned Palestine as a paradise (one man asserts that “there were no problems”) and their insistence that the advent of Israel is responsible for the destruction of this utopia. It is interesting to think about how this feeling (that of being wronged, of being deprived of what is rightfully yours) has been transferred to a younger generation, one with no individual memory of life pre-Israel. For me, the most powerful and tear--jerking scene was the middle-aged man not old enough to have experienced life in the pre-1948 Palestine who nonetheless asserts that "It's my land. My land and I want it!" I was also made acutely aware of my own position as a social researcher while watching the "antropologist in the field..." This scene has had a lasting impression on me and the importance of "cultural competency" (to use a word from Emily S and Lauren) in interacting with human subjects. It also made me reflect once again on the outsider/insider divide.

Lost in Space was intended to showcase the disconnect between ideas of home, borders, and security. Here is Mieke's introduction to the film (split into two parts due to my lack of camera saavy) and the debriefing proccess afterwards:





Because you have access to the summaries, I will just say that the most interesting things about the film were the background shots and sounds (firefighters failing to put out a smoking building, "punks" ignoring their dog, street noise drowning out the speakers in order to represent the way their voices are often lost in the world) and the English subtitles for even those who speak English as a first language. Apparently this was done to establish equality among the speakers.

The last film, Mille et un Jours, concerns a Tunisian man and his upcoming "arranged-consent-greencard-love" marraige. What I found most interesting about this film really had to do with the editing proccess and how Mieke made the film in the context of the tension between traditional Tunisian norms and values and assimiliation into western society. Thinking about the freshly washed lettuce ("now the French will know that Arabs are clean people"), the concern over the scene with the bag of meat, and other parts of the film making and editing proccess so affected by the social and political context made me realize the extent to which Mieke has managed to use art and the humanities to capture the intricacies of contemporary social phenomena and the priveleges and responsibilities that accompany this. While each film is certainly a work of art, it is also societally relevant and constructive in the sense that it informs and motivates the audience.

At the end of the day, I am deeply impressed by Mieke Bal's work and her way of situating art in a relevant and important social/political context. These videos have changed the way I feel about digital media-- because I have seen how one can be respectful and non-invasive while capturing the subject of study on a much more personal and deep level (especially thinking about the closeness I felt to Tarek in Mille et un Jours), I am now more open to using video and other types of media to communicate the findings of my social research.

4 comments:

Emily Yousling said...

The videos are not working...I'll wait for Clifford...

Eye Blogger said...

Hey Emily, I really enjoyed reading this blog post. I have a question for you (which is of particular interest to me) - the same question Clifford asked Mieke Bal: Do you think her videos should be available on the internet? Given your newfound appreciation for digital media, do you think you will do a video for your presentation instead of all writing?

I am genuinely interested to know everyone's opinion on the first question, actually. When Clifford brought the question to her attention, I realized that I don't even have a solid opinion on it (which is crazy considered my high interest in new media and technology, personally and academically).

These questions could be for everyone on our trip, not just Emily so feel free to respond! I am very interested.

Emily Yousling said...

To answer the first question, I do think Mieke's videos should be shown on the internet, and I think it would also be valuable if she added an "extras" section where she discusses the making and editing of these films. Mieke expressed concern that people would misinterpret her videos by only watching unrepresentative sections or missing the message, but I think everyone in the class found her videos moving (even if not in the intended way). And a director's notes (or whatever those extra clips are called) with Mieke would clear up any confusion and highlight important points, like her post-video discussion did for us. Currently her constituency is mostly scholars and artists, and I think her films would be thought-provoking and beneficial for a larger audience.

To answer the second question, while I am now enchanted by digital media and want to include a video element in future projects, I am a little resistant to bringing a camera into religious spaces. While religion is not necessarily more sensitive than the politically-charged subjects of Mieke's films (Israel-Palestine, immigration-integration) and I would not be opposed to SHOWING a video of prayer in these communities, I am hesistant about MAKING the video. For example, think of the prayer we watched in Aya Sofia-- while I certainly benefited from seeing and "understanding" (in the loosest sense of the word) Islamic rituals, I felt uncomfortable violating the privacy of those praying, and I would feel even more strange about setting up a camera in the mosque. I feel like bringing the camera into the space would be the intrusive, morally-charged element for me, not the electronic posting.

Cassie Rowe said...

I think it's really hard to say what should be available on the internet. Without having heard Mieke's response (that she didn't want her works that are very private and personal matters for her subjects to be an object of voyeurism or pornography), I might have never thought of it resulting in that way. But I can understand where she's coming from... there are so many people who get off on others' misery.
But that's also not to say that there aren't creeps who go to galleries, or other venues in which hers or other documentaries are shown. I think the idea of the videos being available on some kind of library database or educational website would be a good idea. They were really fascinating films and I think it would be positive for them to reach wider audiences.

Also, Emily... I definitley feel the same way about the scene about the "anthropologist in the field"... that will stick with me, especially as an anthropology major. There will always be some form of inequality between researcher and subject, and I think that those situations call for sensitivity, while at the same time not being patronizing.

One more comment... My favorite film was the one on displacement. I never actually considered how it feels to be thrown into a world, sometimes indefinitley, where you are in so many ways a foreigner.. how could it feel to never know if you'll go home again? I can't imagine it... This film was really powerful.